Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
File: 123096_jul96_decls1_0244.txt
Subject: SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR INSTALLATION AFTER ACTION REPORT
Unit: 1ST ID
Parent Organization: VII CORPS
Box ID: BX001008
Folder Title: DESERT STORM AFTER ACTION REPORTS
Document Number: 4
Folder Seq #: 11
UNCLASSIFIED
04/19/91
JULLS LONG REPORT
1. (U) JULLS NUMBER: 30732-42932 (00082), submitted by RILEY
AFZN-PTM-0, MR CARLTON, 856-3991, (913)239-3991.
2. (U) Operation DESERT SHIELD conducted by USCENTCOM on 03/01/91.
3. (U) KSYWORDS: RWO (REAL WORLD OPS), USA (US ARMY), ACTIVE
COMPONENT, C2 (COMMAND AND CONTROL), STAFF FUNCTIONS, MISSION,
PLANNING.
4. (U) TITLE: COMMAND AND CONTROL: CONCURRENT CONTINGENCY PLANS
5. (U) OBSERVATION: Fort Riley planned and executed a
deliberate deployment of Active and Reserve Component units
during the period August 1990 - January 1991. Concurrent with
deployment, Fort Riley was required to plan and execute other
contingency plans (mobilization, accelerated +ielding of new
equipment, counterterrorism operations) and was on-call to
execute fire -Fighting, earthquake response, Land Defense of
CONUS (LDC), civil disturbance operations, redeployment and
demobilization. The allocation of resources and integration of
multiple plans highlighted the importance of a coordinated staff
effort.
6. (U) DISCUSSION- Most directorates at Fort Riley are not
manned to have dedicated planners +or multiple contingency
planning. The DPTM orchestrated the staff planning effort to
ensure plans were developed in a prioritized manner. Concurrent
execution of multiple plans was not as easily solved.
A. The first problem involved establishing a command and
control center large enough to coordinate the myriad of details
involved in the execution of multiple OPLANS. Fort Riley
established a Garrison Operations Center (GOC) which controlled
ents and coordinated all other operations. This required
a physical expansion to accommodate the increase of personnel
assigned to or colocated with the GOC. The execution of
mobilization was controlled by a separate operations center
which provided a liaison officer to the GOC.
B. The second problem involved a rapid increase in personnel
required to man the SOC and Mobilization Operations Center (MOC)
on a 24-hoLtr basis. This was accomplished by detail of
personnel to duties outside their normal position, recall of
retirees and IMAS, temporary hires, and overtime.
C. The third problem involved a shortage of units required
-For execution of concurrent plans. At some point in time, all
MTOE Fort Riley Active Component units were either deployed, in
the process of deploying, or alerted for deployment to SWA. Two
units were later deleted from deployment because they had
elements deployed in support a-F an exercise in Bolivia. One of
these units, the 34th Engineer Battalion, provided the Departure
UNCLASSIFIED
@- /.L
Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
Document 517 f:/Week-26/BX001008/DESERT STORM AFTER ACTION REPORTS/special information for installation after actio:12179611150511
Control Fields 17
File Room = jul96_declassified
File Cabinet = Week-26
Box ID = BX001008
Unit = 1ST ID
Parent Organization = VII CORPS
Folder Title = DESERT STORM AFTER ACTION REPORTS
Folder Seq # = 11
Subject = SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR INSTALLATION AFTER ACTIO
Document Seq # = 4
Document Date =
Scan Date =
Queued for Declassification = 01-JAN-1980
Short Term Referral = 01-JAN-1980
Long Term Referral = 01-JAN-1980
Permanent Referral = 01-JAN-1980
Non-Health Related Document = 01-JAN-1980
Declassified = 17-DEC-1996